Governance

Stewarded for the commons.

The infrastructure underneath data spaces should not be owned by any single actor. Kaphera is structured so that cannot happen. Steward ownership separates mission from profit. The governance structure is a legal constraint.

We exist to maintain open infrastructure for the benefit of every organisation that depends on it, from the largest automotive OEM to the smallest tier-3 supplier. That mandate holds when commercial pressure increases. The structure prevents it.

Foundation

Holds veto authority

Veto rights over mission

Kaphera

Steward — mission-locked, cannot be sold or repurposed

No control transferred

Investors

Economic returns only, no governance rights

Steward ownership

Kaphera cannot be sold to a third party that would compromise its mission. Ownership is structurally separated from control. Returns are capped. The steward cannot become the thing it exists to prevent.

Mission-locked governance

A foundation holds veto rights over any change to the company's purpose. The foundation's veto blocks shareholder pressure, acquisition, and strategic pivots. The legal structure makes this permanent.

Capped returns

Investors receive capped returns. Surplus reinvests in maintainers and the shared core. The model is designed for sustainability, not exit.

Radical transparency

All stewarded code lands in open-source foundations under their governance. Public roadmap, public releases, public reasoning. The commons cannot be governed in private.

Infrastructure of the Commons

Shared, sovereign data infrastructure that is less politically encumbered and more globally trustworthy than any single actor's platform. Every serious industrial data-sharing initiative — automotive, manufacturing, logistics, health — runs on Eclipse Dataspace Components as the shared underlying layer.

The central assurance: every component of this layer stays public, auditable, and independently runnable.

The movement

The infrastructure underneath modern society — roads, electrical grids, telecoms — is governed as a commons because no single market actor can be trusted to keep it neutral. Data infrastructure is reaching that same inflection point.

Every major industrial data-sharing effort in automotive, manufacturing, logistics, and health runs on Eclipse Dataspace Components as the shared underlying layer. That layer has no dedicated steward. It runs on goodwill and fragmented contributions. The assurance that no central component is ever withheld as a black box or used for vendor lock-in exists in principle. Kaphera exists to make it structural.

This is what “infrastructure of the commons” means in practice: a shared, sovereign data layer that is less politically encumbered and more globally trustworthy than any single actor's platform, maintained at production pace by an organisation whose governance structure prevents it from capturing the thing it was built to keep free.

Automotive

Manufacturing

Logistics

Health

Other industries

Eclipse Dataspace Components

The shared layer — stewarded in the open by Kaphera, owned by no single actor

No black box

The EDC operator Kaphera maintains is Apache 2.0. The code is public, auditable, and runnable by any team independently. Work funded by an ecosystem lands upstream in its open-source foundation, under foundation governance, not Kaphera's.

Neutral by structure

Shared infrastructure that crosses company and national boundaries must be less politically encumbered than any single actor's platform. A foundation holds veto rights over any change to Kaphera's purpose. No shareholder can override the mission. Neutrality is a legal constraint, not a brand promise.

Globally trustworthy

The infrastructure that allows communities to share knowledge and data should never be extractive. It stays in the hands of the people, open source, contributing to a world in which we advance human potential and all life on Earth.

More on this in The Infrastructure of the Commons — Substack

Financing sovereign infrastructure

Commons infrastructure cannot depend on a single funding source or on the commercial interests of any one actor. Kaphera uses three complementary streams — each designed so that no stream gives its source control over the mission.

Operational revenue

Circle of stakeholders

Open-source upstream

Shared Infrastructure & Mission

Governance stays with the steward council — no funding stream buys a seat at the table

Operational revenue

Everything Kaphera builds is open source or source-available at its core. Kaphera offers managed connector services on EU sovereign infrastructure as an additional option. The platform earns through operational excellence. Surplus reinvests in maintainers and the shared core.

Circle of stakeholders

A circle of industrial and public organisations contributes funding to the shared infrastructure layer. Contributions are structured as investments with capped economic returns, not governance rights. Governance stays with the steward council. No participant controls the commons by virtue of funding it.

Open-source upstream

Our team's role at the Eclipse Foundation is to fund, maintain, and drive contributions upstream to EDC while keeping the critical operational layer open. Work funded by an ecosystem lands in its foundation under foundation governance. This is the technical basis for the stakeholder model's credibility: anyone can verify the layer is genuinely open.